<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Automatic Stay and Foreclosures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chapmanbankruptcy.com/2010/02/11/the-automatic-stay-and-foreclosures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chapmanbankruptcy.com/2010/02/11/the-automatic-stay-and-foreclosures/</link>
	<description>Bankruptcy Lawyer &#38; Attorney; West Palm Beach, Florida</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:01:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stem Client Roundup for February 2010 &#8211; Law Firm Web Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.chapmanbankruptcy.com/2010/02/11/the-automatic-stay-and-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Stem Client Roundup for February 2010 &#8211; Law Firm Web Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapmanbankruptcy.com/?p=141#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] West Palm Beach bankruptcy attorney Ron Chapman wrote about automatic stays and foreclosures in bankruptcy proceedings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] West Palm Beach bankruptcy attorney Ron Chapman wrote about automatic stays and foreclosures in bankruptcy proceedings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay S. Fleischman</title>
		<link>http://www.chapmanbankruptcy.com/2010/02/11/the-automatic-stay-and-foreclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay S. Fleischman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chapmanbankruptcy.com/?p=141#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the terrific new blog, Ron!

Though it&#039;s true that successive bankruptcy cases may lead to a limitation of the automatic stay, it&#039;s not a forgone conclusion that the stay will not exist.

If you&#039;ve filed a single case in the past year that was dismissed then the stay lasts for only 30 days.  It may, however, be extended by order of the court.  The lawyer needs to make a motion to extend the stay and prove that the successive filing is in good faith.

If you&#039;ve filed a 2 or more cases in the past year that was dismissed then the stay is not automatic, and must be imposed by order of the court.  The lawyer needs to make a motion to invoke the stay and prove that the successive filing is in good faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the terrific new blog, Ron!</p>
<p>Though it&#8217;s true that successive bankruptcy cases may lead to a limitation of the automatic stay, it&#8217;s not a forgone conclusion that the stay will not exist.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve filed a single case in the past year that was dismissed then the stay lasts for only 30 days.  It may, however, be extended by order of the court.  The lawyer needs to make a motion to extend the stay and prove that the successive filing is in good faith.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve filed a 2 or more cases in the past year that was dismissed then the stay is not automatic, and must be imposed by order of the court.  The lawyer needs to make a motion to invoke the stay and prove that the successive filing is in good faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
